Evaluation of women's sexual quality of life, depression, and sexual functions in the pregnancy and postpartum periods: A multi-centered study.

AIM: This multi-centered, longitudinal, and prospective study aims to identify women's sexual functions, sexual quality of life, and depression and their relationships with each other in the pregnancy and postpartum periods. METHODS: The participating pregnant women (n = 113) were interviewed six times: once in each trimester, and once in the eighth week third month, and sixth month postpartum. This study was conducted in three regions of Turkey including Marmara, Mediterranean, and Central Anatolia regions. Data were collected through the "Socio-demographic Form," "Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)," Sexual Quality of Life-Female Questionnaire (SQLQ-F), and "Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D)." While the first interviews were administered face to face, successive ones were administered via phone. RESULTS: The sexual dysfunction rates of the participants were found to be high in the pregnancy and postpartum periods, and their sexual quality of life, which decreased as the pregnancy months progressed, was found to increase significantly with the progress in the postpartum period. The sexual dysfunction increased and sexual quality of life decreased significantly with the increase in depression symptoms in the pregnancy and postpartum periods. When the depressive symptoms decreased especially in the sixth month postpartum, sexual quality of life was also found to increase. CONCLUSIONS: As a result, in the pregnancy and postpartum periods, it is highly important to provide women with diagnosis through a holistic approach by creating available environments to assess their psychological health and sexual functions and refer them to the related physicians when necessary.

Intraoperative superior hypogastric plexus block for pain relief after a cesarean section: a case-control study.

AIM: To investigate the efficacy of intraoperative superior hypogastric plexus (SHP) block for postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing a cesarean section. METHODS: One hundred and fifteen pregnant women scheduled for an elective cesarean under general anesthesia were randomly divided into an SHP block (n=65) and a control group (n=50). SHP block was administered with bupivacaine injection. The controls received saline injection in the SHP area. Postoperative pain was assessed by the 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS). The presence of side effects and complications, including opioid or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) requirement, gastrointestinal function, nausea, and vomiting were evaluated. RESULTS: The SHP block group had significantly lower VAS scores 2, 6, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively (P<0.001) and required a significantly lower rescue dose of NSAID or opioids (P=0.003, P<0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: SHP block may be an effective and safe pain relief treatment after a cesarean section.

3D high frequency endovaginal ultrasound evaluation of urethral and pelvic morphology in stress urinary incontinence in first pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the morphological characteristics of pelvis and urethra in nulliparous pregnant women with and without stress urinary incontinence (SUI) by 3D high-frequency endovaginal ultrasound (3D-EVUS). STUDY DESIGN: At 36-38 weeks of gestation, 40 nulliparous pregnant women with and without SUI underwent 3D-EVUS assessment. The anteroposterior and transverse diameters of levator hiatus (LH), pubovisceral muscle thicknesses at 3,9 and 12 o'clock, right and left paravaginal areas, symphysis angle, bladder-symphysis distance (BSD), uretral complex thickness (Ut), urethral complex width (Uw), urethral complex volume (UV), urethral length (UL), intramural urethra, rhabdosphincter thickness (Rt), rhabdosphincter width (Rw), rhabdosphincter length (RL), and rhabdosphincter volume (RV) were measured by 3D-EVUS. RESULTS: Longer LH transverse diameter (34.8 ± 3.8 mm vs 31.1 ± 2.1 mm), shorter LH anteroposterior diameter (47.8 ± 6.2 mm vs 52.4 ± 2.6 mm), and wider symphysis angle (116.3 ± 5.6 vs 111.5 ± 5.3 degrees) were detected in nulliparous pregnant women with SUI compared those without SUI (p = 0.001, p = 0.001 and p = 0.013; respectively). RV of less than 1.26 cm3 was found to have a sensitivity of 100 % and a specificity of 100 % for the presence of SUI in nulliparous pregnant women. CONCLUSIONS: Constitutionally different pelvic shape and decreased urethral rhabdosphincter measurements can be used to predict SUI in nulliparous pregnant women.

Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy in a Woman at 12 Weeks' Gestation.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy for a case of uterine prolapse in a 12 weeks, 3 days pregnant woman. To our knowledge this is the first case of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy performed at 12 weeks of gestation to be reported in literature. DESIGN: A step-by-step explanation of the surgical procedure (Canadian Task Force classification III). SETTING: Maltepe University Hospital. PATIENT: A 37-year-old pregnant woman. INTERVENTION: Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy. Institutional Review Board ruled that approval was not required for this study. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Uterine prolapse is very rare condition, manifesting in an estimated 10 000 to 15 000 pregnancies [1]. The management plan must be individualized, and the obstetrician should aware of possible complications, such as preterm labor, high incidence of abortion, cervical ulceration, and cervical dystocia. In general, bedrest, good genital hygiene, and pessary use is recommended. Alternatively, in cases where conservative solutions have failed, laparoscopic surgery in the pregnant patient may be considered. To date, only 1 case of laparoscopic promontohysteropexy at 10th weeks of gestation was reported by Pirtea et al [2]. A 37-year-old woman, at 12 weeks and 3 days of gestation, with stage III pelvic organ prolapse was referred to our clinic. Conservative management with pessary failed. The patient underwent laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy after written informed consent form was obtained. In exploration, uterine manipulation was difficult because of softness and large size of the uterus. First, the sigmoid colon was suspended at the abdominal wall to gain an adequate surgical field. The promontorium was dissected and the parietal peritoneum incised on the right pelvic side wall after ureter visualization. A polypropylene mesh was fixed to the cervix at the level of the uterosacral ligaments. The other edge of the mesh was fixed at the level of the promontory using the Uplift device (Neomedic International, Barcelona, Spain). Then, the peritoneum was sutured to cover the mesh. The patient was discharged 2 days after surgery. At the examination the pelvic floor was detected to be normal. The patient delivered a healthy baby weighing 3030 g by cesarean section at 38 weeks of gestation. The position of the mesh was controlled during surgery. There was no peritoneal fold detected on the cervical part of mesh; however, no adhesion was observed. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy may be an alternative and safe approach, if conservative treatment fails, for pelvic organ prolapse during pregnancy.